<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fair Use Lab &#187; Future of Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairuselab.net/category/future-of-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairuselab.net</link>
	<description>Re-Imagining Accessibility, Disability &#38; the Public Sphere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Steven B. Johnson: &#8220;The Glass Box and the Commonplace Book&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/28/steven-johnson-the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book/</link>
		<comments>http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/28/steven-johnson-the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video talks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuselab.net/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this talk  given at the Columbia University Journalism School. Steven Johnson argues that the future of digital texts could go in two divergent directions. They could be confined in iPad-like “locked glass boxes” that cannot be shared or remixed. Or they could remain fungible and shareable in open formats that resemble the commonplace books from centuries past, personally curated collections of aphorisms and quotations. <a href="http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/28/steven-johnson-the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="lsplayer" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://cdn.livestream.com/grid/LSPlayer.swf?channel=columbiajournalism&amp;clip=pla_a4b8690a-bbfb-4fab-8acc-9305da4f7c42&amp;autoPlay=false" /><param name="name" value="lsplayer" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="lsplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="340" src="http://cdn.livestream.com/grid/LSPlayer.swf?channel=columbiajournalism&amp;clip=pla_a4b8690a-bbfb-4fab-8acc-9305da4f7c42&amp;autoPlay=false" wmode="transparent" name="lsplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object><br />
In this <a href="http://www.livestream.com/columbiajournalism/share?clipId=pla_a4b8690a-bbfb-4fab-8acc-9305da4f7c42&amp;utm_source=lsplayer&amp;utm_medium=ui-share&amp;utm_campaign=columbiajournalism&amp;utm_content=columbiajournalism">talk</a> given at the Columbia University Journalism School. Steven Johnson argues that the future of digital texts could go in two divergent directions. They could be confined in iPad-like “locked glass boxes” that cannot be shared or remixed. Or they could remain fungible and shareable in open formats that resemble the commonplace books from centuries past, personally curated collections of aphorisms and quotations.</p>
<p>Jeremy Caplan summarized Johnson’s essential points in the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/04/28/the-ipad-and-the-future-of-text/">WSJ Digits</a> Blog:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>“Textual productivity” is the Web’s most important feature.</strong><br />
When text is shared, remixed and recombined in new contexts, fresh value is created. Mr. Johnson calls that “textual productivity.” Thomas Jefferson, for example, famously remixed the Bible, leaving out the supernatural bits. Before the Web, it was more difficult to rejigger texts. The Web reinvented the sharing, spreading and productive adaptation of information in new ways that multiply its value. It’s vital that e-texts preserve that capability, Mr. Johnson says.</p>
<p><strong>The iBook freezes text.</strong><br />
Web links can connect previously isolated ideas in many ways. That gives digital texts the power to add rich layers of meaning that printed texts cannot. But many iPad apps and Apple’s iBook software thus far limit the way words can be linked, Tweeted or shared. That suggests a step backward from the Web’s potential. Mr. Johnson contrasts the locked approach with the stance adopted by investigative nonprofit site ProPublica, which has a generous “steal our stories” policy to encourage the free dissemination of its articles for public benefit.</p>
<p><strong>So will e-readers resemble glass boxes?</strong><br />
If digital devices lock texts under a glass screen, preventing readers from manipulating or sharing words in meaningful ways, we will miss out on some of the benefits of ideas that are mashed up and mixed together, Mr. Johnson says. If, on the other hand, companies such as Apple open up texts for linking, sharing and other Web-like usage, we’ll enjoy fruitful “textual productivity.” People once relied on books to store ideas for future inspiration. Mr. Johnson hopes the serendipitous sharing that enabled will serve as a model for more open sharing of digital texts. Are you listening, Steve Jobs?</p></blockquote>
<p>Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/stevenbjohnson">@stevenbjohnson</a> on Twitter | Read <a href="http://www.stevenberlinjohnson.com/2010/04/the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book.html">transcript</a> of talk | See more at <a href="http://columbianm.blogspot.com/2010/04/talk-steven-berlin-johnsons-hearst-new.html">CJS New Media</a> blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/28/steven-johnson-the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Talk Features Leo Ebook Reader on April 5</title>
		<link>http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/01/tech-talk-features-leo-ebook-reader-on-april-5/</link>
		<comments>http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/01/tech-talk-features-leo-ebook-reader-on-april-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kurzweil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuselab.net/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tek Talk offers an early look at Blio, the new touchstone in accessible e-book reading for everyone, Monday, April 5, 2010. This will provide an opportunity to learn more about the exploding world of e-books and the especially exciting e-book reader called Blio just being released by K-NFB Reading Technology. <a href="http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/01/tech-talk-features-leo-ebook-reader-on-april-5/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via News Wire/<a href="http://www.accessibleworld.org/">accessibleworld.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Tek Talk  offers an early look at Blio, the new touchstone in accessible e-book reading  for everyone, Monday, April 5, 2010. This will provide an opportunity to learn  more about the exploding world of e-books and the especially exciting e-book  reader called Blio just being released by K-NFB Reading Technology.</p>
<p>As  publishing of books around the world moves from ink on paper to digital bits and  bytes, blind people have mobilized to insist that new products and media being  developed must be accessible. Protests about lack of access with the Amazon  Kindle have attracted public notice, but now comes Blio, providing a dynamic and  accessible presentation of e-books to everyone. Therefore, during this week&#8217;s  Tek Talk event, James Gashel, Vice President of Business Development at K-NFB  Reading Technology will demonstrate how Blio works and explain how this  technology is about to make millions of books readily available on computers and  mobile devices. Tired of waiting for books to be reproduced or transcribed in to  accessible formats? Join us and learn how Blio gives blind people equal access  in the mainstream world of books, newspapers, and magazines. Following the  presentation, there will be plenty of time for questions from the virtual  audience.</p>
<p>Contact: James Gashel</p>
<p>Email: <a href="javascript:main.compose('new',%20't=jim@knfbreader.com')" target="1">jim@knfbreader.com</a></p>
<p>Date:  Monday, April 5, 2010</p>
<p>Time: 5:00 PM PDT, 6:00 PM MDT,  7:00 PM CDT, and 8:00 PM EDT</p>
<p>and elsewhere in the  world Tuesday 0:00 GMT</p>
<p>Approximately 15 minutes prior  to the event start time; go to The Pat Price  Tek Talk Training Room at:</p>
<p><a href="http://conference321.com/masteradmin/room.asp?id=rsc9613dc89eb2" target="1">http://conference321.com/masteradmin/room.asp?id=rsc9613dc89eb2</a></p>
<p>Or,  alternatively.</p>
<p>Select The Pat Price Tek Talk Training Room at: <a href="http://www.accessibleworld.org/" target="1">www.accessibleworld.org</a></p>
<p>Enter your first and last names on the sign-in  screen.</p>
<p>All Tek Talk training events are  recorded so if you are unable to participate live at the above times then you  may download the presentation or podcast from the Tek Talk archives on our  website at <a href="http://www.accessibleworld.org/" target="1">www.accessibleworld.org</a></p>
<p>If you are a first-time user of  the Talking Communities online conferencing software, there is a small, safe  software program that you need to download and then run. A link to the software  is available on every entry screen to the Accessible World online  rooms.</p>
<p>All online interactive programs  require no password, are free of charge, and open to anyone worldwide having an  Internet connection, a computer, speakers, and a sound card. Those with  microphones can interact audibly with the presenters and others in the virtual  audience or text chat with the attendees. To speak to us, hold down the control  key and talk; then let up to listen.</p>
<p>Accessible World uses News  Wires, like this one, to inform people of the topic and times for the many  Discussion Groups on Accessible World. The lists are announce only to keep the  traffic to a minimum. You can join the Accessible World Announce List, the Tek  Talk Announce List or the Sports Talk Announce List by completing the form at:  <a href="http://www.accessibleworld.org/mailinglists" target="1">www.accessibleworld.org/mailinglists</a></p>
<p>Accessible World also provides  a Tek Talk Discussion List. This list is intended to give you an opportunity to  ask computer related questions, suggest topics to be used in the weekly Monday  training programs, or just to interact with others interested in using assistive  devices to access computers. You may sign up for this list by selecting the Tek  Talk Discussion link on the same page and completing the form.</p>
<p>Accessible World Contacts:<br />
Robert  Acosta, Chair<br />
Accessible World<br />
818-998-0044<br />
Email: <a href="javascript:main.compose('new',%20't=boacosta@pacbell.net')">boacosta@pacbell.net</a><br />
Web:  <a href="http://www.helpinghands4theblind.org/" target="1">www.helpinghands4theblind.org</a></p>
<p>Joann Becker, Events Coordinator<br />
Accessible  World<br />
617-487-8795<br />
Email: <a href="javascript:main.compose('new',%20't=joannbecker@comcast.net')">joannbecker@comcast.net</a></p>
<p>Steve  Hoffman, President<br />
Talking Communities<br />
Email: <a href="javascript:main.compose('new',%20't=steve@talkingcommunities.com')">steve@talkingcommunities.com</a></p>
<p>The Accessible World, a  division of Helping Hands For The Blind, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit  organization, seeks to educate the general public, the disabled community and  the professionals who serve them by providing highly relevant information about  new products, services, and training opportunities designed specifically to  eliminate geographic and access barriers that adversely affect them</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fairuselab.net/2010/04/01/tech-talk-features-leo-ebook-reader-on-april-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel Reetz: The Why in DIY Book Scanning &#124;</title>
		<link>http://fairuselab.net/2010/03/23/daniel-reetz-the-why-in-diy-book-scanning/</link>
		<comments>http://fairuselab.net/2010/03/23/daniel-reetz-the-why-in-diy-book-scanning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkman Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuselab.net/?p=874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[via the Berkman Center, [Today] The Why in DIY Book Scanning &#124; Berkman Center: Daniel Reetz, founder and steward of the DIY Book Scanner community Tuesday, March 23, 12:30 pm Berkman Center, 23 Everett Street, second floor This event will &#8230; <a href="http://fairuselab.net/2010/03/23/daniel-reetz-the-why-in-diy-book-scanning/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via the Berkman Center, <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheon/2010/03/reetz">[Today] The Why in DIY Book Scanning | Berkman Center</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Daniel Reetz, founder and steward of the DIY Book Scanner community</p>
<p>Tuesday, March 23, 12:30 pm<br />
Berkman Center, 23 Everett Street, second floor<br />
This event will be <a href="Berkman Center">webcast live</a> at 12:30 pm ET and archived on our site shortly after.</p>
<p>The  DIY Book Scanner community (founded in June 2009) has produced a diverse ecosystem of book scanning hardware and software to address a wide range of human needs, both domestically and internationally. Daniel  will motivate these efforts with case studies from the community, and hope to foster discussion on the future of digital books in light of these unmet needs.</p>
<p><em>Daniel will be bringing and demonstrating how  scanner works at this lunch talk. </em></p>
<h3>About Daniel</h3>
<p>Daniel  Reetz is an artist and a Ph.D student studying visual  neuroscience. Since 2003 He has been employed as an artist and as a  researcher at the intersection of those interests, working on NIH, NSF,  and US D.o.Ed funded projects.</p>
<p>He recently developed a high-speed book scanning system using open  source technology, cheap cameras, and garbage. This free and open  scanner design <a href="http://www.epiloglaser.com/news_epilog_challenge_winner.htm">won  the Epilog Grand Challenge</a>, has been <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/diy-book-scanner/">featured  in Wired</a>, and is now being improved and instantiated by a group of  over 300 DIY&#8217;ers who believe that the future of digital books is <a href="http://onthecommons.org/content.php?id=2629">too important to be  decided solely by corporate interests</a>&#8230;</p>
<h3>Links</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.diybookscanner.org/">DIY Book Scanner</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/diy-book-scanner/">Wired  Magazine on the DIY Book Scanner</a></li>
<li><a href="http://onthecommons.org/content.php?id=2629">OnTheCommons: DIY  Book Scanner Takes Off</a></li>
</ul>
<li><a href="http://www.diybookscanner.org/news/?p=17">Pictures of the book  scanner</a></li>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fairuselab.net/2010/03/23/daniel-reetz-the-why-in-diy-book-scanning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is An Audiobook Really a Book?</title>
		<link>http://fairuselab.net/2009/12/02/is-an-audiobook-really-a-book/</link>
		<comments>http://fairuselab.net/2009/12/02/is-an-audiobook-really-a-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing by ear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuselab.net/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see red whenever I run into the pompous assertion that reading by listening to a book read aloud is not really reading. Then I ask (loudly, of course, to anyone who will listen), how did I read Ulysses (three times in as many decades) and Finnegans Wake (not quite once, completely)? How did I read À la recherche du temps perdu, Gravity’s Rainbow, and The Structure of Scientific Revolutions? Was I deluding myself, or merely faking it? <a href="http://fairuselab.net/2009/12/02/is-an-audiobook-really-a-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see red whenever I run into the pompous assertion that reading by listening to a book read aloud is not really reading. Then I ask (loudly, of course, to anyone who will listen), how did I read <em>Ulysses</em> (three times in as many decades) and <em>Finnegans Wake</em> (not quite once, completely)? How did I read <em>À la recherche du temps perdu</em>, <em>Gravity’s Rainbow</em>, and <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em>? Was I deluding myself, or merely faking it?</p>
<p>Yesterday on <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120769925">NPR</a>, I heard novelist Neil Gaiman ask, is an audiobook really a book? He paraphrased Harold Bloom on behalf of the naysayers: “You need the whole cognitive process, that part of you which is open to wisdom. You need the text in front of you.”</p>
<p>Gaiman followed Bloom’s judgment with his own: “I find that astonishingly unconvincing. I think you can have a close and perfectly valid relationship with the text when you hear it.”</p>
<p>Then audio book director Rick Harris insisted that he <em>wants</em> the experience to be different:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is not a book. An audiobook is a separate entity. A novel can be seen as many things, and one of the things it can be seen as is a script for an audio performance. But it is another thing; it is an audiobook that has its own validity, its own limitations, its own strengths. The human voice is unquestionably the most expressive musical instrument there is. Combine those two and you get an audiobook.</p></blockquote>
<p>To my great surprise, I found myself nodding at this like a Bobble-head. I think commercial audiobooks <em>are</em> something different, not just from printed books, but also from the books I read that were recorded for the National Library Service for the Blind. The production values that commercial publishers foist onto “audio performances” are, well, cheesy. The abridgments, the musical interludes with 101 strings, the histrionic characterizations by overwrought actors &#8212; such dramaturgy imposes interpretations on the text that cut the reader out of it.</p>
<p>So the litmus test for determining when a book is a book isn’t whether you see or listen. It’s whether your “relationship” with the text is really yours.</p>
<p>[See <a href="http://fairuselab.net/?page_id=635">Listening to the Literacy Events of a Blind Rader</a> for an academic perspective on how I read Thomas Kuhn’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions"> The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</a>.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fairuselab.net/2009/12/02/is-an-audiobook-really-a-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Is A Maker, Not Just A Taker</title>
		<link>http://fairuselab.net/2009/11/13/google-is-a-maker-not-just-a-taker/</link>
		<comments>http://fairuselab.net/2009/11/13/google-is-a-maker-not-just-a-taker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Willis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuselab.net/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph Esposito identifies himself as a traditionalist on copyright (“during the term of copyright, copyright serves the interests of the producer”), but he challenges the assertion that Google is “a taker, not a maker” in Publishing in the Google Ecosystem (in The Scholarly Kitchen) <a href="http://fairuselab.net/2009/11/13/google-is-a-maker-not-just-a-taker/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Esposito identifies himself as a traditionalist on copyright (“during the term of copyright, copyright serves the interests of the producer”), but he challenges the assertion that Google is “a taker, not a maker” in <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/11/13/publishing-in-the-google-ecosystem/">Publishing in the Google Ecosystem</a> (<em>The Scholarly Kitchen</em>).  For example, Google made an API that enables publishers to add book search features to their websites that they were unlikely to create on their own. Esposito writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Whatever one thinks of Google (and all publishers think about Google), there is little doubt that in just a few years, Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have become the most influential people in the publishing industry, at least in the U.S., taking that distinction away from Jeff Bezos.</p>
<p>&#8230; Google is now the defining entity in the information landscape.  To flourish, as best as publishers can hope to flourish, it’s necessary to find a place within the Google ecosystem.  There is no world elsewhere, no little pocket of commerce beyond the reach of Google’s audience aggregation, no opportunity to erect protectionist barriers or to appeal to the legacy of one’s own institutions.  To those who resent Google’s huge bulk and ambition, it has to be said:  Get over it.</p>
<p>&#8230; With the invention of the motion picture by Thomas Edison, the book lost its place as the center of the media universe.  All other innovations, from radio to television to the Internet, helped to push the book out further.  Now we live within a media landscape that has no center, but which does have a dominant issue, and that is the matter of online discovery, for which search engines, and Google in particular, are the dominant modes.</p>
<p>For publishers, this is the Google century, or maybe just the Google decades, but either way, not to engage this extraordinary organization is likely to lead to obscurity. <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/11/13/publishing-in-the-google-ecosystem/">Read more</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to Eric Rumsey (<a href="http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/hardinmd/">Seeing the Picture</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/ericrumsey">@ericrumsey</a>) for pointing me this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fairuselab.net/2009/11/13/google-is-a-maker-not-just-a-taker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

